In 1993, the Interim Constitution was adopted, after, and in terms of the agreements reached during the Codesa negotiations. The final Constitution, the one we have today, was adopted in 1996; thirty years ago, that why it now “celebrates” it. Thirty years of misery. Thiry years of failure. Thirty years that have left everyone dissatisfied and depressed; everyone, except the cadres and feed at the trough, the tenderpreneurs and the Cat Matlalas of this world; criminals who now control law enforcement agencies. But, boy, celebrate we will celebrate, singing to the greatness of those that have impoverish us and destroyed the country.

This is South Africa for you – companies and enterprises bragging about the level of discrimination it is practicing. Not only that, but the more you discriminate, the more you have bragging rights. The top is Level 1 BBBEE. Beautiful; it simply means you discriminate 100% against White South Africans. And you are handsomely rewarded for it; for discriminating against a minority of the population, for excluding them from opportunities. In 1994 we were told that the foreseeable duration for “redress” will be twenty years. After twenty years, we were told the time-line have changed to thirty years. Twenty years were not long enough to recover from the legacy of apartheid. After thirty years we are told the time-line is now infinity; as long as it may take to bring about “demographic representatively”.

Die begrip “Rooi-gevaar” het voortgespruit uit die feit dat die Kommunisme hulself gedefinieer het met die woord “rooi” (byvoorbeeld, die destydse Weermag van die Sowjetunie het bekend gestaan as die “Red Army”). Daar is absoluut geen twyfel dat daar destyds ʼn “rooi gevaar” in Suid-Afrika was nie; bedoelende dat daar ʼn gevaar was dat bewegings en groepe wat die Kommunisme ondersteun het, in Suid-Afrika beheer oor die staat kon verkry, en die land vierkantig in die invloedsfeer van die Kommunistiese Blok sou geplaas het. Dit sou die strategiese posisionering en geopolitieke werklikhede van die tyd ingrypend beïnvloed het, want dit sou die Sowjetunie beheer gegee het oor die Kaapse handelsroete, en oor die strategiese minerale van die land. (Destyds was die Suid-Afrikaanse mynbousektor uitstekende bestuur, voordat BBBEE, korrupsie en kader- ontplooiing dit toenemend ondermyn het).

Donald Trump has opened a soar in the South African national psyche that has festered a long, long time, when he openly declared that the South African government in practicing discrimination against its White minority population. I know he primarily did this for his own personal political purposes, but, for me, it does not matter; I don’t care one bit. Also, in typical Trump style, he said it in a dramatic manner, with some of his accusations unfortunately bordering on disinformation. There is no White genocide in South Africa. There is, however, gross and fragrant institutionalized racial discrimination against minorities, more specifically the White monitories, and very specifically against the Afrikaners. The Afrikaners, or, as referred to in derogative terms, including by very influential political leaders in the country, including from the ANC, as “the Boers” have always been the main, the key antagonists of the ANC government, since it took over state power in the 1990s. This was the population group most intimately associated with the system of Apartheid, and therefore the group primarily target in the period of revenge that followed since 1994. I am not arguing that the government is involved in the wide-spread murder on farmers and farmer workers in the country, which will constitute genocide, what there definitely is an ideological carelessness on the its side about the murders on White farmers.

Public servants inherited from the pre-1994 dispensation was never disloyal to the new government, and they definitely did not attempt to undermine its agenda in any manner at all. They were trained and institutionalized to serve the government in power. That is exactly what they have done, and excellently so. But they had to deal with a hostile government, driven by ideology and a firm determination to get rid of everything and anyone associated with the old government. The behavior and misuse they were exposed to, were shameful.

Fikile Mbalula has recently threatened to kick United States Ambassador to South Africa, Leo Brent Bozell III, out of the country unless he toes the line. Actually, to be more precise, his exact words were: “There is another old man who came into our country from the United States. He began to open his big mouth and attack this constitutional court, our court, our democracy. They demolished him. Well, South African is indeed a sovereign country, and kick out whoever they wish, I guess; in theory anyway. But nevertheless, it couldn’t do any harm to remind Mr. Mbalula about the geopolitical differences between South African and the United States of America, and why the latter perhaps has reason to me more confident about a clash between the two country than the former.

The ANC and its leftist partners have destroyed the country's economy since it took over the levers of the state; because of its socialist and anti-Western ideological policy framework, and because of their racist so-called transformation policies.

The video contains Frans Minnaar's perspectives on the Government of National Unity.

The video clip explains the relationship between the National Democratic Revolution and the Freedom Charter.

The video explores the current state of global power relations and the United States' National Security Strategy.

The ANC Class of ’94 dominates South Africa’s government until this very day. The likes of Cyril Ramaphosa, Gwede Mantashe and many others were never, since 1994, not in powerful positions of domination and adoration. The younger generation allowed into this exclusive ruling elite, were groomed form a young age to believe they are untouchable, beyond reproach.

An Integrated Development Plan (IDP) is a mandatory, five-year strategic plan for South African municipalities, acting as a single, holistic framework for all development, service delivery, and budgeting, coordinating efforts across different government spheres (national, provincial, local) and stakeholders to improve residents' quality of life, focusing on economic and social needs. It's a legally binding document that integrates community needs, financial resources, and strategic goals, guiding all development decisions and superseding other local plans.

I don’t think a coup d’état is imminent in South Africa (but I may be wrong, who knows). However, something is cooking, boiling just below the surface. Thing is, realistically speaking, what counter force is there in South African to prevent the take-over of government by the military? The Police is in a total mess; even if they want to, I very much doubt whether they will have the capacity to successful counter a coup attempt. And I do not think that they necessarily would to even like to try. As proven over-and-over again, specifically with the wide-spread unrest in the country, focusing on KwaZulu-Natal and Gauteng in 2021, the country’s intelligence services are, for all practical purposes, non-existing. The part that is partly operational, will probably sympathise with potential plotters to grab power through military means.

Israel and the United States should have attacked the Iranian regime. But the objectives must have been much clearer and specific, focused on eliminating the major risks identified. Well, in my ignorant opinion, that is what should have happened. I am afraid that, what is currently unfolding, is a scenario of defeating a conventional fundamentalist regime, but replacing it with something, or somewhat that may actually be worse for Israel and the West in the long run. That is what happened, ultimately in Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq. See my point?

I have done an analysis of trends in the results of by-elections conducted from the time of the 2021 Local Government elections to the end of February 2026. I have used two datasets obtained from the website of the Independent Electoral Commission, namely: -- A “Winners” report; that is, an analysis of trends in wards, focusing on the margins of the winning political parties; distinguishing between the outcomes during the 2021 Local Government elections in wards where by-elections were since conducted, versus the results of the said by-elections. -- A “Votes” report; that is, an analysis of trends in the number of votes casted on political parties participating in the different by-elections since the 2021 local government elections.